The Facebook algorithm has got it in its head that I am in the market for a solar power wall and so keeps feeding me ads for LiFePO4 batteries. Except that none of the ones made for RV solar can be adapted to a 52V e-bike. Then I discovered one made by Dakota that seems viable. I have done a comparison of this against standard Lithium packs and share my findings:
I really wanted to find a way to use LiFePO because I'm not thrilled with the service life of lithium batteries. Without spitting hairs about YMMV use and abuse, let's compare the warranty life as a baseline. Lithium packs typically have a warranty of one year, whereas Dakota LiFePO4 batteries have a warranty of 11 years.
One Dakota model in particular stood out as unique in that its recommended maximum charge is 14.4V, which means 4 units can make a 52V system in series.
Comparison results by Charge capacity (21-25 Ah):
The Dakota is about 66% heavier, by similar charge capacity, meaning its specific energy is about 62% of the lithium packs. It is about 5% more expensive in up-front cost.
However, given the service life of 10+ years, it is about 11% the cost, amortized over 11 year warranty period.
Other considerations:
LiFePO4 requires a charger specific to this chemistry
A switching circuit is needed to connect batteries to the load in series, but to charger in parallel. I have not found a 52V LiFePO charger.
No disrespect to Luna packs intended (I only compared models that are no longer available). The BOOANT models were randomly found and taken as representative of high-end, Chinese made systems.
I really wanted to find a way to use LiFePO because I'm not thrilled with the service life of lithium batteries. Without spitting hairs about YMMV use and abuse, let's compare the warranty life as a baseline. Lithium packs typically have a warranty of one year, whereas Dakota LiFePO4 batteries have a warranty of 11 years.
One Dakota model in particular stood out as unique in that its recommended maximum charge is 14.4V, which means 4 units can make a 52V system in series.
Comparison results by Charge capacity (21-25 Ah):
The Dakota is about 66% heavier, by similar charge capacity, meaning its specific energy is about 62% of the lithium packs. It is about 5% more expensive in up-front cost.
However, given the service life of 10+ years, it is about 11% the cost, amortized over 11 year warranty period.
Type | AVERAGE of Charge capacity | AVERAGE of Price tot | MEDIAN of Weight tot | MEDIAN of Specific energy | MEDIAN of Cost/Energy | MEDIAN of Cost/service life |
https://dakotalithium.com/product/da...fepo4-battery/ | 23 | 916 | 25.6 | 101.2 | $0.78 | $0.07 |
https://booant.com/collections/52v-t...39557397807167 | 25 | 836 | 15.4 | 182.9 | $0.65 | $0.65 |
https://lunacycle.com/52v-luna-direwolf-ebike-battery/ | 21 | 795 | 14.5 | 163.1 | $0.74 | $0.74 |
Average or Median | 23 | 849 | 15.4 | 163.1 | $0.74 | $0.65 |
Dakota % of median | 166% | 62% | 105% | 11% |
Other considerations:
LiFePO4 requires a charger specific to this chemistry
A switching circuit is needed to connect batteries to the load in series, but to charger in parallel. I have not found a 52V LiFePO charger.
No disrespect to Luna packs intended (I only compared models that are no longer available). The BOOANT models were randomly found and taken as representative of high-end, Chinese made systems.
Comment