Originally posted by marcos
View Post
Down the road we could increase the motor temp allowance, I tested these motors at 150°C for a pretty long time but I want to be on the safe side for now, peek gears don't like to be that hot and the motor cover reaches 120°C which I personally don't mind but could be worrisome for users.
Both good points - 120*C on the cover would make for a relatively bad day with someone's calves... Do you know what the controller cover reaches in comparison?
Seems like from prior statement and chart, it's not really worth potting or additional heat sinks on the controller side of things?
(Note - this is being asked from a reliability/longevity perspective - you saw the log I was able to send you and I run mostly in PAS 2/3 of 9 so am looking for reliability/longevity > bleeding edge etc..)
Um, I think that error table doesn't match the table I have been using. As long as vesc can identify the fault source it's easy to change the number the display shows.
I checked the dealer manual which amusingly has bunches of PNs but not for cables or internal motor breakdown and PN diagram, and also doesn't have the error codes in it. Is there a better one for reference?
No, you can flow 1000 Amps through a motor phase while only drawing 10Amps from the battery.
When the BMS trips, the whole system shuts down including the display, so you don't really get any error code. Disconnecting the battery at ful load will likely produce an overvoltage event, not sure if it has time to log it though.
When the BMS trips, the whole system shuts down including the display, so you don't really get any error code. Disconnecting the battery at ful load will likely produce an overvoltage event, not sure if it has time to log it though.
Comment