I'm researching a commuter build for a combination of closed bike paths with some street bike lane riding in the DC suburbs. I'm wondering if I need a front suspension to provide more control at the higher speeds.Specifically, I'm looking at two Cannondale frames. 1) Cannondale Quick 2) Cannondale Bad Boy2. The Bad Boy 2 is similar to the quick though it has a fatty head shock in the front fork. I'm a smaller person (135 lbs) so a lighter bike is material to me as I plan on pedaling to subsidize my range. For people that have ridden both with and without suspension on commuter bikes, is the suspension necessary to reduce fatigue on longer rides. Are there control issues at consistent higher speeds (25-30 mph vs 15-25 mph?) that a suspension fork helps with? My original dream build was a Cannondale quick carbon, now I'm leaning towards a bad boy as a relatively light bike with a bit of give in the handlebars, though the Quick will also be a few hundred cheaper.
Thoughts on suspension vs not?
Thoughts on suspension vs not?
Comment